baspocket.blogg.se - Is bluestacks vs memu

apk files on all the app players.īlueStacks 5 had the fastest install time of 5 seconds. We picked up some popular titles and tried to install their. Memu tried its best but still ended up being 36% slower.The yawning gap was evident in the case of Nox, which used 65% more RAM.

We ran graphically demanding strategy games and MMORPGs on 3 simultaneous instances each of all App Players with identical test setups.īlueStacks 5 required the least amount of RAM. Memu too struggled a bit and consumed 31% more RAM.Nox took up 53% extra RAM putting a lot of strain on the system.LDPlayer tried to power through but consumed 26% more RAM.We tested BlueStacks against other App Players to see how efficiently they use a crucial resource like RAM.īlueStacks consumed the least amount of RAM Memu was a whopping 322% slower, which meant a lot of waiting.LDPlayer tried hard but was still 122% slower.The tests were done on machines with identical specs.īlueStacks 5 was the fastest with a boot time of 9 seconds.

We ran a couple of tests to see how quickly we can get gaming.

Memu pulled all its weight, but still, its CPU usage was 37% higher.

Nox consumed 37% more CPU resources with a noticeable lag in-app performance.

LDPlayer registered a massive 145% higher CPU usage.

BlueStacks 5 outshined all the emulators, consuming about 10% CPU. Unlike other emulators, BlueStacks 5 consumes fewer resources and is easy on your PC. Intel/Nvidia/ATI, Onboard or Discrete controller with benchmark score >= 750 Intel or AMD Multi-Core Processor with Single Thread benchmark score > 1000 The results are an average of the measurements done across multiple PCs with different specifications. We compared the RAM usage, App performance, and CPU consumption of LDPlayer, Memu, Nox, and BlueStacks 5. Here we demonstrate why it is the best Android gaming platform for PCs. BlueStacks 5 outscores all the Android emulators out there on every parameter.